<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.technet.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US"><title type="html">Rant Space</title><subtitle type="html" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/atom.xml</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/default.aspx" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/atom.xml" /><generator uri="http://communityserver.org" version="2.1.61025.2">Community Server</generator><updated>2009-01-27T14:48:00Z</updated><entry><title>Installing the Windows Mobile Emulator. Shortcuts dont appear on the Start Menu</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/11/05/installing-the-windows-mobile-emulator-shortcuts-dont-appear-on-the-start-menu.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/11/05/installing-the-windows-mobile-emulator-shortcuts-dont-appear-on-the-start-menu.aspx</id><published>2009-11-05T16:54:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-05T16:54:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;I cant claim this, thanks Mike.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Saved us some pain.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After the install of the WM image itself of the emulator (6, 6.1, 6.5 etc) it all appears to work but there is nothing on the Start Menu for it. This makes it difficult (but not impossible for the patient) to fire up the emulator.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rerunning the image install again and doing a Repair seems then to go through and add in the shortcuts as we'd like&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3291758" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>services not starting because they are timeing out prematurely?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/11/05/services-not-starting-because-they-are-timeing-out-prematurely.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/11/05/services-not-starting-because-they-are-timeing-out-prematurely.aspx</id><published>2009-11-05T14:02:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-05T14:02:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;most likely in a repro/vm setup where resources are the limiting factor?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;extend service startup tolerance with&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE \System \CurrentControlSet \Control]&lt;BR&gt;ServicesPipeTimeout = "30000"&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;60000 by default in w2k3. set in ms&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3291704" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>OWA not working and showing red Xs instead of the images?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/11/04/owa-not-working-and-showing-red-xs-instead-of-the-images.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/11/04/owa-not-working-and-showing-red-xs-instead-of-the-images.aspx</id><published>2009-11-04T17:01:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-04T17:01:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;it is possible for the IUSR anonymous auth account password to get out of sync between where its held in AD and the metabase&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you can test this by unchecking anonymous auth on default website and exchweb and enabling IWA&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;stop and start the default website&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;does IWA auth work with OWA?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if so the password for anonymous auth are out of sync&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/297989"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/297989&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;helps getting them back in sync&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3291457" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>E2k3 PF hierarchy or content not replicating in or out of a particular server. Using Sophos Pure Message?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/08/17/e2k3-pf-hierarchy-or-content-not-replicating-in-or-out-of-a-particular-server-using-sophos-pure-message.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/08/17/e2k3-pf-hierarchy-or-content-not-replicating-in-or-out-of-a-particular-server-using-sophos-pure-message.aspx</id><published>2009-08-17T11:42:00Z</published><updated>2009-08-17T11:42:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;We've had a couple of cases where Subject tagging in the product has caused PFs to stop moving out the server.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The way we found this was quite typical for a PF case...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Use diagnostic logging on the server in question for PF and the IS objects&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Find the message in the events logged&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Track the message and found it only gets as far as the Categorizer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This led me to some previous cases where PureMessage can cause this if subject tagging is on&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps somone!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3274099" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>OWA E2k3 stops working with 503 Service unavailable</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/07/31/owa-e2k3-stops-working-with-503-service-unavailable.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/07/31/owa-e2k3-stops-working-with-503-service-unavailable.aspx</id><published>2009-07-31T11:55:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-31T11:55:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;Looking at the IIS logs this specifically is a 503 0 0 on the get verb on Exchange virtual directory&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This KB helps here &lt;A href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823159"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823159&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Found a couple of instances of needing HKCRScan and this finding a key that is problematic (contact MS support for this tool)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They typically start Nxxxxxxxxx&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps put in by NetApp? At least ive seen them put in by NetApp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3269617" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Perfmon Counters appear as numbers</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/07/16/perfmon-counters-appear-as-numbers.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/07/16/perfmon-counters-appear-as-numbers.aspx</id><published>2009-07-16T15:57:00Z</published><updated>2009-07-16T15:57:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;Odd this one, not sure how it happened but it did.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Looks like the perfc009.dat is corrupt (file that contains the counters)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Get the file (system32 i seem to recall) from a similar OS machine, backup the broken one and copy in a good one.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Try perfmon now&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3265274" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>How do OCS Address books work, and why is mine broken?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/05/13/how-do-ocs-address-books-work-and-why-is-mine-broken.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/05/13/how-do-ocs-address-books-work-and-why-is-mine-broken.aspx</id><published>2009-05-13T13:30:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-13T13:30:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;That is a very good question...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A great link i eventually was able to get is at&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&lt;A href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb963980.aspx"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb963980.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;So...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;AD has all the info&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;The user replicator shifts this info to the OCS SQL DB in the ABUserEntry table&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;The ABServer process moves these files to a NTFS files structure in the form of Full and Differential files with names that are hex of a date that once happened :S&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;These are then made available through IIS where the client will download these to galcontacts.db&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;Saying that info is still pulled from OL contacts and also in some instances direct LDAP requests are made to the OCS pool itself&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3240193" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Setting up a quick OCS 2007 test environment</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/05/08/setting-up-a-quick-ocs-2007-test-environment.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/05/08/setting-up-a-quick-ocs-2007-test-environment.aspx</id><published>2009-05-08T18:46:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-08T18:46:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;Perhaps virtualised for testing?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Physical HW is obviously better&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Two W2k3 or W2k8 boxes&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Configure TCPIP appropriately on the two machines so they can chat using static IPs&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Name machines appropriately&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Promote one to a DC&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;DC is a DNS server&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Install CA services on the CA&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On OCS server install OCS 2007 Standard Edition, this will give a good test bed on minimum machines (assuming this is for repro/testing only!)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;Install IIS as per prompt in OCS wizard&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;Install AD tools as per prompt in OCS wizard&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;This will install SQL and all the necessary components&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;When installed and the services are strarted the Monitoring service may not start, if&amp;nbsp;not you may&amp;nbsp;need to install the Message Queuing Feature&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;Start the relevant services&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;Install Admin tools as per OCS setup Wizard&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;Create a couple of users, Enable them for OCS&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;Use the Validation wizard to do some testing, they should be able to sign in&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;Install OCS client&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;Set to Manual Config and point to the OCS server (FQDN) and set to TLS&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;For Auto sign in and other DNS records necessary watch this nice little video... &lt;A href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/office/ocs/dd221358.aspx" mce_href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/office/ocs/dd221358.aspx"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/office/ocs/dd221358.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;Setup your DNS entries and you should now be able to autosign in!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3237747" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Windows Mobile not syncing with HTTP 500 internal server error and nextags showing problems with syncstate table</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/05/07/windows-mobile-not-syncing-with-http-500-internal-server-error-and-nextags-showing-problems-with-syncstate-table.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/05/07/windows-mobile-not-syncing-with-http-500-internal-server-error-and-nextags-showing-problems-with-syncstate-table.aspx</id><published>2009-05-07T17:02:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-07T17:02:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;Odd one this, it seems a couple of the reasons this can be seen are down to a corrupt syncstate table, for whatever reason..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also if we hit problems with limits on named properties we may fail with an internal server error 500 if something like iphone is adding further named props and Exchange has hit a limit on these. But to be honest if youre at the stage where youre dealving into nextags logging you might be in a good place to give us at support a call!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3236894" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>OCS calling users when unlocking machine or switching from other apps</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/05/07/ocs-calling-users-when-unlocking-machine-or-switching-from-other-apps.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/05/07/ocs-calling-users-when-unlocking-machine-or-switching-from-other-apps.aspx</id><published>2009-05-07T17:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-05-07T17:00:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;This has been brought to our attention as an intermittant issue but with more work has given a thorough reproduction around the keypressing actions in the OCS client. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This behaviour is being investigated by the debug team and will be passed onto the product group accordingly.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Watch this space...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3236892" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>OCS DNS record creation</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/04/02/ocs-dns-record-creation.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/04/02/ocs-dns-record-creation.aspx</id><published>2009-04-02T16:13:00Z</published><updated>2009-04-02T16:13:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;SVR, A, SIP, internal, external? All of the above, some of the above? All and fingers crossed?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm setting up OCS to have a play around and althought its in the documentation much friendlier is this TN link on setting the the needed DNS records&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/office/ocs/dd221358.aspx"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/office/ocs/dd221358.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3221553" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Outlook takes a long time to mark Calendar appointments as tentative - sniffer process is slow</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/03/19/outlook-takes-a-long-time-to-mark-calendar-appointments-as-tentative-sniffer-process-is-slow.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/03/19/outlook-takes-a-long-time-to-mark-calendar-appointments-as-tentative-sniffer-process-is-slow.aspx</id><published>2009-03-19T19:27:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-19T19:27:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;Interesting this, at least i found it interesting as i had no idea this goes on. Mainly as im an Exchange person! Anyway, i still ended up looking into this...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The process in Outlook that inspects Calendar appointments and marks them as tentative (amongst other things it does) is the sniffer process.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is some nice info on it:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;When you send out a meeting invite and the attendees respond to the meeting with Accept/Decline/Tentative responses, Outlook processes these responses either through the sniffer process, when you view the response in the Reading Pane, or when you open the response. When Outlook processes a response it locates the parent meeting (on the organizer's Calendar) for the response so the tracking tab on the meeting can be updated with the response type (Accept/Decline/Tentative) for the attendee.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;POSSIBLE CAUSES:&lt;BR&gt;================&lt;BR&gt;Following are common scenarios where Sniffer stops functioning or the owner loses the Sniffer Lock:&lt;BR&gt;1. In Manager/Delegate scenario, Manager’s sniffer lock might be owned by delegate, if Manager’s outlook profile was closed and delegate is accessing manager’s calendar&lt;BR&gt;2. 3rd party addin or application on the Outlook client causing Sniffer Process to stop functioning&lt;BR&gt;3. If the user logs on to multiple Outlook client machines to access mailbox, the Sniffer lock will be moved to this Outlook client&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;We can carry out the following tests to check for the behaviour in different scenarios:&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Scenario 1: Manager / Delegate:&lt;BR&gt;1. Remove all the delegate from Users Outlook profile&lt;BR&gt;2. Launch Outlook with the /sniff switch at least once. This is to make sure the Sniffer Lock remains with users Outlook profile&lt;BR&gt;3. Make sure Outlook is launched normally, without the /sniff command switch&lt;BR&gt;4. Try to reproduce the issue&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Scenario 2: Third party addins or applications:&lt;BR&gt;1. Check for 3rd party addin and applications on users client machine in the following registry path&lt;BR&gt;a. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\Outlook\Addins&lt;BR&gt;b. HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\Outlook\Addins&lt;BR&gt;If we find any 3rd party addins in the above path, export the registry key(s) and check for the issue in Outlook&lt;BR&gt;2. Also run Process Explorer to capture all the Dlls getting loaded with Outlook.exe&lt;BR&gt;1. Start Outlook&lt;BR&gt;2. Download and extract Process Explorer from &lt;BR&gt;&amp;lt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/ProcessesAndThreads/ProcessExplorer.mspx"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/ProcessesAndThreads/ProcessExplorer.mspx&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;3. Double-click Procexp.exe&lt;BR&gt;4. On the View menu make sure "Show lower pane" is checked.&lt;BR&gt;5. Press CTRL + D&lt;BR&gt;6. In the Process Explorer window, scroll down the list of files and then select Outlook.exe.&lt;BR&gt;7. On the File menu click Save As&lt;BR&gt;8. Save Outlook.exe.txt to your desktop and send it to me.&lt;BR&gt;9. We will analyze the log file and check for any 3rd party Dlls. &lt;BR&gt;10. If any 3rd party Dlls are present, we will disable/uninstall the associated application and check for the issue&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Scenario 3: User logging on to multiple Outlook client machines&lt;BR&gt;1. Check if user logs on to other Outlook client machines&lt;BR&gt;2. If yes, the Sniffer lock will be moved to this Outlook client&lt;BR&gt;3. If she doesn’t access her mailbox from multiple Outlook client, please ignore this scenario&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3215291" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Canon Printer, Email and Exchange 2007</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/03/09/canon-printer-email-and-exchange-2007.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/03/09/canon-printer-email-and-exchange-2007.aspx</id><published>2009-03-09T14:55:00Z</published><updated>2009-03-09T14:55:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;Morning all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Quite an interesting one this...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In Exchange 2003 a printer may have worked fine, however when moving to E2k7 this no longer works. Scouring the Internet it seems there are a few people who have this issue.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To get such an anonymouns connection properly in E2k7 we need&amp;nbsp;a receive connector.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This blog link talks about how we need to add the ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Any-Sender to the connector&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/12/28/432013.aspx"&gt;http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2006/12/28/432013.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However if we look at the SMTP protocol log for the recevie connector we see that we are getting a 501 5.1.3 Invalid Address&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Interesting....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.microsoft.com//kb/944302"&gt;http://support.microsoft.com//kb/944302&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;explains here that E2k7 is less tolerant than E2k3 of a Mail From: that is not formatted as it would like.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps some people!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3210748" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>New WM emulator images! 6.1.4</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/02/26/new-wm-emulator-images-6-1-4.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/02/26/new-wm-emulator-images-6-1-4.aspx</id><published>2009-02-26T12:50:00Z</published><updated>2009-02-26T12:50:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;Excited? I am... very&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;looking at some internal training on the new beauty of the WM OS's&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You (and I) will be very happy to know that new versions are avaible at &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1A7A6B52-F89E-4354-84CE-5D19C204498A&amp;amp;displaylang=en"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1A7A6B52-F89E-4354-84CE-5D19C204498A&amp;amp;displaylang=en&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Enjoy...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3206932" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Microsoft System Center Data Protection Manager 2007 is not supported on this operating system...</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/01/27/microsoft-system-center-data-protection-manager-2007-is-not-supported-on-this-operating-system.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.technet.com/andym/archive/2009/01/27/microsoft-system-center-data-protection-manager-2007-is-not-supported-on-this-operating-system.aspx</id><published>2009-01-27T17:48:00Z</published><updated>2009-01-27T17:48:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P&gt;After the 2nd install of SP2 for W2k3 and after installing &lt;STRONG&gt;all&lt;/STRONG&gt; the prereqs for DPM on my W2k3 &lt;STRONG&gt;SP2 &lt;/STRONG&gt;VM&amp;nbsp;I had had enough of it not installing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After a quick read it seems you cant have DPM on a machine that is a DC.... Doh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.technet.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3191968" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>andym</name><uri>http://blogs.technet.com/members/andym.aspx</uri></author></entry></feed>