Subscribe in a reader" />
Welcome to TechNet Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

Andrew Fryer's Blog

Insufficient Data

News

SQL Server 2008 Sparse Columns

Sparse Columns are another new feature of SQL Server 2008 and are included in the February CTP (CTP6). They pretty much do what they say on the tin; offering a trade-off between taking more space to hold data, but none at all when they are empty.  They don't get you over the 1024 column limit, but could mean you can squeeze more columns into the 8,060 byte row limit for SQL Server.

Like everything in SQL Server you need to know when they add value and when to avoid them like the plague. Fortunately one of the non-sparse areas of Books On-Line is the section covering sparse columns here

So the good news first:

  • Storing a null in a sparse column takes up no space at all.
  • To any external application the column will behave the same
  • Sparse columns work really well with filtered indexes as you will only want to create an index to deal with the non-empty attributes in the column.
  • You can create a column set over the sparse columns that returns an xml clip of all of the non-null data from columns covered by the set.  The column set behaves like a column itself. Note: you can only have one column set per table.
  • Change Data Capture and Transactional replication both work, but not the column sets feature.

And the downsides.

  • If a sparse column has data in it it will take 4 more bytes than a normal column e.g. even a bit (0.125 bytes normally) is 4.125 bytes and unique identifier rises form 16 bytes to 20 bytes.
  • Not all data type can be sparse: text, ntext, image, timestamp, user-defined data type, geometry, or geography or varbinray (max) with the FILESTREAM attribute cannot be sparse. (Changed17/5/2009 thanks Alex for spotting the typo)
  • computed columns can't be sparse (although sparse columns can take part in a calculation in another computed column)
  • You can't apply rules or have default values.
  • Sparse columns cannot form part of a clustered index.  If you need to do that use a computed column based on the sparse column and create the clustered index on that (which sort of defeats the object).
  • Merge replication doesn't work.
  • Data compression doesn't work.
  • Access (read and write) to sparse columns is more expensive, but I haven't been able to find any exact figures on this.

As you can see from Books On-Line there is a really useful guide to when to use them for a particular data type e.g. if more than 64% of your values are null in an int column then use sparse columns, and basically the longer the data type the lower the threshold for using sparse columns.

So how does it work? Just put the keyword SPARSE into a create table statement:

CREATE TABLE CustomerDemographics

(CusomterID int PRIMARY KEY,

Gender varchar(7) NOT NULL,

EducationLevel varchar(20) SPARSE NULL,

SalaryBand varchar(10) SPARSE NULL)

Selects against this table will work exactly as for normal columns whether the sparse column is included as a column in the select column or a filter in a where clause.

Optionally to create a column set for this table append this to the end of the create table statement:

DemographicSet XML COLUMN_SET FOR ALL_SPARSE_COLUMNS

The column set DemographicSet is then treated like any xml column i.e. it can be selected and also be used for updates and inserts, Note if you do use a column set for updating data sparse columns not specifically declared in the update well be set to null.

Finally if you are wondering why this feature was developed, the simple answer is to support future versions SharePoint which was also one of the drivers behind FileStream.  I can see it being applied to any content management system over SQL Server and also as I have mentioned before for reducing the overhead of storing customer demographics or product catalogs where not every column applies to every product or customer.

Posted: Thursday, February 28, 2008 10:47 AM by Andrew_Fryer

Comments

Technical Musings said:

SQL Server 2008 will be coming out sometime this summer (in theory). At last week's TechFuse event in Minneapolis, and in blogs I sometimes read, I've started to pick up on a number of useful features and improvements that should...

# March 4, 2008 11:32 AM

new 维生素C.net() said:

SummaryofUsefulFeaturesinSQLServer2008SQLServer2008willbecomingoutsometimethissumm...

# March 19, 2008 5:14 AM

Pablo Damiani: <br /><b>Lito's Blog</b> said:

Last weekend I&#8217;ve been researching and learning about the new features in SQL Server 2008 . I&#8217;ve

# April 28, 2008 10:54 PM

fd2000 said:

It seems to be that SharePoint will not end with one list stored in one sql table in future versions ;-(

Sparse columns can possibly be used efficently to store the whole data in only a few tables (as now - but much better). And it will practically overcome the current limitation of a fixed number of data columns of given type (e.g. numbers) in SharePoint because of (as I know) there is no practical limit in amount of sparse columns - or?

Frank

# November 20, 2008 11:31 AM

TheDataDude said:

Is there any advantages/disadvantages using data compression over using sparse columns

# November 26, 2008 12:59 AM

Andrew_Fryer said:

DataDude

yes the way you can get back all the non empty values stored in a set of sparse columns in the column set, and you can use both techniques together to get even more space on your row.

Andrew

# November 27, 2008 2:28 AM

Vijaya Kadiyala said:

Does NULL occupy space in SQL Server?

# March 30, 2009 1:42 PM

Andrew_Fryer said:

Yes unless you have compression set on (enterprise edition only) or don't have sparse columns

# April 1, 2009 3:16 AM

Alex said:

Thanks for this post.  One thing: "Not all data type can be sparse: text, ntext, image, timestamp, user-defined data type, geometry, or geography or varbinray (max) with the FILESTREAM attribute can be sparse."

I assume you mean "cannot" at the end.  You contradict yourself and it might confuse people.

# May 14, 2009 3:11 PM

Andrew_Fryer said:

Alex

Thanks changed the post accordingly

# May 18, 2009 2:40 AM
Leave a Comment

(required) 

(required) 

(optional)

(required) 

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Page view tracker